Franco-German Consensus on More European Integration in Defence and Immigration Policy

Research

German and French MPs agree that higher national investments may spur growth in the eurozone.

French and German members of parliament (MPs) are both open to granting more competencies to the EU in the fields of defence and immigration policy. There is, however, considerable disagreement on certain reform proposals for the eurozone. While the French politicians support the adoption of a joint liability scheme in form of Eurobonds and a common European Monetary Union unemployment insurance (EMU-UI), German representatives are opposing these proposals. MPs from both countries agree, however, that higher investments by Member States may serve as an instrument to spur growth in the eurozone. These are the findings of a study by the Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), which will be presented in Brussels today.

In collaboration with the École Polytechnique in Paris and the University of Mannheim, ZEW surveyed members of the German Bundestag as well as members of the French Assemblée Nationale and the Sénat. A total of 232 MPs from both countries participated in the survey conducted between April and July 2016. According to the survey, French MPs are in general more open towards shifting competencies to Brussels than their German colleagues. In particular in the fields of taxation, wage policy and labour market regulation, German MPs are more reluctant to grant more competencies to the EU than their French counterparts.

When asked about reform proposals for the eurozone, German and French MPs adopted different positions. There is, for instance, disagreement between MPs from both countries regarding policy proposals, which are intended to increase fiscal integration such as Eurobonds or a common EMU-UI, with the majority of French MPs advocating such a policy and German MPs opposing it. “Given the unfavourable conditions in the French labour market as well as France’s fragile fiscal situation, French MPs may perceive the possible net benefits of adopting solidarity measures,” says Professor Friedrich Heinemann, co-author of the study and head of the ZEW Research Department “Corporate Taxation and Public Finance”.

When it comes to the assessment of the European Central Bank's (ECB) current monetary policy, views are polarised between Paris and Berlin: Whilst the ECB’s asset purchase programmes enjoy strong backing from French MPs, many members from the Bundestag voiced scepticism about these transactions. The survey revealed a Franco-German divide even within party families, particularly when asked about controversial issues. For instance, members of the German conservative party were strictly against the introduction of Eurobonds. Among the French conservative party members, by contrast, the result was less unanimous. However, further Franco-German consensus was established as MPs from both countries agreed on the potential of higher national investments as a remedy for low growth.

All in all, the survey provides a clear indication of both the potentials and limits of new Franco-German reform initiatives in a post-Brexit EU. “Due to the lack of a basic consensus among the two largest countries in the eurozone, the implementation of groundbreaking reforms for the institutional set-up of the euro is unlikely to happen. In contrast, new integration options in the fields of defence and immigration may count on a Franco-German backing,” concludes Friedrich Heinemann, summarising the results of the survey.

For more information please contact

Prof. Dr. Friedrich Heinemann, Phone +49(0)621/1235-149, E-mail heinemann@zew.de