Organized Labor Versus Robots? Evidence From Microdata

ZEW Discussion Paper Nr. 25-005 // 2025
ZEW Discussion Paper Nr. 25-005 // 2025

Organized Labor Versus Robots? Evidence From Microdata

New technologies drive productivity growth, yet the distribution of gains may be unequal. We study how labor market institutions – specifically shop-floor worker representation – mediate the impact of automation. Combining German individuallevel administrative records with plant-level data on industrial robot adoption, we find that works councils reduce the separation risk for incumbent workers during automation events. When labor markets are tight and replacement costs are high, incumbent workers become more valuable from the firm’s perspective. Consequently, we document that the moderating effects of works councils diminish. Older workers, who face greater challenges reallocating to new employers, benefit the most from organized labor in terms of wages and employment. Finally, we observe that works councils do not hinder robot adoption; rather, they spur the use of higher-quality robots, encourage more worker training during robot adoption, and foster higher productivity growth thereafter.

Findeisen, Sebastian, Wolfgang Dauth und Oliver Schlenker (2025), Organized Labor Versus Robots? Evidence From Microdata, ZEW Discussion Paper Nr. 25-005, Mannheim.

Autoren/-innen Sebastian Findeisen // Wolfgang Dauth // Oliver Schlenker